Research Showcase Verified Prototype

SynchroSwarm: Decentralized Consensus and Velocity-Obstacle Collision Avoidance for Autonomous Terrestrial Micro-Swarm Logistics

SynchroSwarm is a decentralized multi-agent terrestrial robotics platform featuring peer-to-peer ESP-NOW mesh networking and Reciprocal Velocity Obstacle (RVO) algorithms for autonomous collaborative warehouse logistics.

Author
Aarav Sen
Institution
Distributed Automation Systems & Multi-Agent Robotics Lab
Age
18 yrs
Published
Oct 2026
SynchroSwarm: Decentralized Consensus and Velocity-Obstacle Collision Avoidance for Autonomous Terrestrial Micro-Swarm Logistics Cover Image
01

Research Overview

SynchroSwarm explores decentralized coordination among homogeneous micro-mobile ground robots. Moving away from vulnerable centralized master-node architectures, each swarm agent independently runs distributed consensus protocols, dynamic Voronoi partitioning, and Reciprocal Velocity Obstacle (RVO) kinematic planning. The swarm collaboratively transports oversized payloads and navigates congested dynamic corridors without single-point failure risks.

02

Problem Statement

Centralized multi-robot orchestration systems in automated warehouses (such as automated guided vehicle fleets) fail catastrophically when wireless access points experience latency spikes or packet drops. Furthermore, computational complexity scales exponentially with fleet size, resulting in routing bottlenecks, deadlocks, and costly operational shutdowns.

03

Research Objective

01

Build a fleet of 10 autonomous micro-differential drive ground robots equipped with Ultra-Wideband (UWB) relative localization.

02

Implement an ad-hoc peer-to-peer wireless mesh network running custom collision-free consensus protocols with sub-5ms message broadcast.

03

Deploy 2D Reciprocal Velocity Obstacles (RVO2) to prevent kinematic deadlocks in dense intersection crossings.

04

Demonstrate cooperative multi-agent payload transport where multiple robots dock beneath and jointly maneuver an unactuated pallet.

04

Proposed Research Approach

Agents broadcast state vectors (position, velocity, target intent) at 50 Hz via low-latency mesh protocols. Each agent projects neighboring trajectories into velocity-space cones (velocity obstacles), selecting the optimal collision-free acceleration vector that minimizes goal divergence while ensuring bilateral clearance.

05

System Architecture

  • Agent Hardware: Custom dual-motor micro-chassis with precision N20 metal gearmotors, optical encoders (720 pulses/rev), and omnidirectional caster.
  • Localization & Mesh: Decawave DWM1000 Ultra-Wideband transceiver delivering ±5cm inter-agent ranging; ESP32-S3 dual-core microcontroller (240 MHz).
  • Proximity Sensing: 360-degree ring of 6 time-of-flight (ToF) laser ranging sensors (VL53L1X) detecting uncommunicative obstacles up to 4 meters.
  • Power Subsystem: 7.4V 2S Li-Po battery with integrated gas-gauge IC and automated inductive self-docking charging coils.
06

Training and Validation

  • Simulation Environment: 100-agent swarm simulated in PyBullet and Gazebo prior to hardware deployment.
  • Physical Swarm Testing: 10 physical hardware units deployed across a 6m x 6m structured logistics testbed with dynamic static obstacles.
  • Deadlock Analysis: Evaluated across symmetrical head-on collision tests, circular anti-phase swapping, and bottleneck doorway transits.
07

Real-Time Swarm Application

Robots autonomously negotiate transport priorities via leaderless consensus voting. When a transport task is published to the local mesh, agents form dynamic coalitions based on proximity and battery reserves, converge on the pallet, lock into formation, and synchronize drive torques.

08

Experimental Design

Metrics tracked total mission execution time, energy consumption per transported kilogram, inter-agent minimum clearance margins, and packet-loss resilience during forced RF jamming.

09

Performance Evaluation

  • Inter-Agent Collision Rate: 0.00% across 500 autonomous crossing trials.
  • Mesh Synchronization Latency: 3.8 ± 0.4 ms across 10 hops.
  • Maximum Cooperative Payload: 8.5 kg transported stably by a 4-agent coalition.
  • Reconfiguration Time: < 1.4 seconds when an agent is simulated as abruptly failing.
10

Research Questions

Key Research Inquiries
RQ1Can local relative UWB ranging replace global overhead cameras for stable distributed swarm formation control?
RQ2How do packet dropouts in ad-hoc mesh networks impact the velocity obstacle safety buffer under high agent density?
RQ3What decentralized voting heuristic minimizes energy consumption in dynamic coalition formation for collective load carriage?
11

Suggested Technology Stack

  • Hardware: ESP32-S3, DWM1000 UWB Modules, VL53L1X ToF Sensors, Magnetic Quadrature Encoders.
  • Software: FreeRTOS, ESP-IDF, C++17, Python (Swarm Monitor Tool), WebSockets, Plotly Dash.
12

Research Deliverables

01

Hardware open-source PCB design files and 3D printable chassis components.

02

Embedded C++ Reciprocal Velocity Obstacle (RVO2) library optimized for microcontrollers.

03

Decentralized consensus and dynamic task allocation firmware protocol suite.

04

Extensive experimental video repository and quantitative performance documentation.

13

Industry-Relevant Applications

Next-generation distributed fulfillment centers, automated container port shunting, disaster rubble search, and collective planetary surface regolith hauling.

14

Research and Ethics Considerations

Distributed autonomous systems must guarantee fail-safe state transitions during communication degradation. All agents implement passive dynamic braking upon consecutive packet timeout thresholds.

15

Expected Research Outcome

A fully operational, completely decentralized micro-robot swarm demonstrating robust obstacle avoidance and collaborative multi-agent logistics without requiring a master server or central Wi-Fi router.

16

Future Research Scope

Extending algorithms to 3D aerial drone swarms, incorporating visual relative pose estimation via onboard micro-cameras, and exploring flocking algorithms in GPS-denied turbulent outdoor environments.

17

Suggested Project Classification

Domain
Robotics / Swarm Intelligence & Distributed Systems
Research Areas
Multi-Agent Systems • Swarm Robotics • Decentralized Algorithms • UWB Positioning • Collision Avoidance
Technology Level
Validated Multi-Robot Hardware Prototype

Masterless multi-agent robotics orchestrating resilient warehouse logistics through decentralized consensus.

19

One-Line Project Summary

A decentralized swarm robotics platform combining peer-to-peer mesh communications with Reciprocal Velocity Obstacle algorithms to achieve autonomous, collision-free collaborative logistics without centralized servers.

Link copied!